Wednesday: Why do I even bother trying to make fish sandwiches?

I mean, look at this. Nice piece of ono, some lettuce and sriracha on a pita.  Five seconds later it was a drippy mess, with the pita shredding itself and bidding the concept of "structural integrity" farewell.  Maybe I need to pull the fish, and let it sit on a rack or something for a few minutes?  Cook it slower so the juices aren't forced out?  Abandon the idea of fish sandwiches entirely?

It needed more salt, too.

This is a religion I could get behind.

• I like this Superman ring.
• I know the red Bostons aren't the preferred breed color. Still, this one is super cute.
• Ok, so I finally found them.  However, I don't need a dozen.  Anyone out there want to go halfsies on a box of marrow spoons?
• Now, far be it from me to suggest forcibly taking property away from someone.  However, a headline like "Oracle's Larry Ellison to buy Lanai," makes me think otherwise.  For a state with so little land to start with, is it really right for one person to own almost an entire island?
• Also, fuck Obama for house prices dropping between 2005-2008. He should have known running for president would make the recession named after him even if it started three years earlier.  From a comment: "Exactly his(or at least his puppet masters) aim. You can't incite their type of revolution when there is a healthy middle class. They want only the very rich and the very poor. Marx spent chapters railing against the 'bourgeoisie' because he knew they stood in his way."  
• 

Since when do the middle class control the means of production?  If you don't even understand the bare minimums of a concept, how can you offer any meaningful commentary?  This is what you get if you base everything off the assumption that "Marx is bad, therefore everything bad is Marxist."  Marx's issue with the bourgeoisie was not because they were the middle class that could prevent "his type of revolution." Rather, it's the fact that having a few wealthy owners controlling production effectively enslaves the proletariat (via wages or job availability) to their whims and desires.  In such a situation, you could easily imagine the wealthy using differences in pay among the proletariat to suggest that those who make more have their pay and benefits cut.