Here are three, with different numbers and positions for the dots (randomly distributed), except for the centered single dot case. |
I've chosen Gaussians for the shape of the dots, because those are simple to work with. Now, take the 2D Fourier transform of these three images. What does the power spectrum look like?
Those curly-cue shapes are ~20 orders of magnitude smaller than the peak. That's what I get for plotting logarithms. |
To within the floating point accuracy of my computer, these power spectra are all identical. No matter where the dots are on the image, the power spectrum is identical. How does that work? Basically, the power spectrum just says "the image is this big, and the things that show up on it look like this." All of the position information is stored in the phase information between the real and imaginary components:
Bigger dots have a smaller sized dot in the power spectrum, as wider things are dominated by smaller frequency terms (also the fact you can directly calculate that F(Gaussian(sigma)) = Gaussian(1/sigma)).
Just some fun math I spent part of today playing with.
"Wow. The service here sucks." |
- People are stupid.
- Not racist, but #1 with racists.
- This thing blowing up everywhere was kind of funny to read about today.
- Ice King, you know you're just going to get all donked up for this, right?
- Did I post this robot comic before? Go read it again. Robots.
No comments:
Post a Comment