Either I screwed up the timezones, or everyone in existence was trying to snipe arXiv on Friday. Maybe my clock is just off? Whatever. It'll probably be awhile before I have the chance to do it again.
 |
| Basically this. |
- What an idiot.
- A very good reason not to work in the financial sector, even though I'm pretty sure they're probably not using that fancy of a set of algorithms, which would make it reasonably easy. How do I know that? If they're doing predictions that fast, there can't be many un-parallelizable calculations.
- "He spent four months refining the statistical model, based on 32 pieces of information, culled from consumer data bases, ranging from income level to military status and voting record in midterm elections. Veterans and midterm voters are both more likely to have health coverage." Why is that? Because veterans usually have VA coverage, and "midterm voters" => "old people" => "people who have government health care through Medicare." So, basically, people who have the government provide health care have health care. And it's not like old people have an irrational hatred of the ACA, right?
- Oh. Fuck you, old people. (page 4)
- Hambo.
- This title is misleading. If you sum up the "in school", "grace", and "deferment" columns, you get the fraction that are either still in school, just left school, or are in the military. Isn't the whole point of student loans that you don't have to pay them until when none of those things apply to you?
- Squirrel.
No comments:
Post a Comment